I've been mulling the issue for a while: Why don't more people cycle to work? There are a number of excuses given. I thought I'd have a go at dealing with some of them.
1) It's too far. Fair enough - 10 miles is probably the longest reasonable daily commute by bike (though some do much more), but this is something of a cultural and life-style choice. People endure long commutes at the cost of health, marriage, fitness and time in order to gain an extra bathroom, used rarely.
I've avoided a long commute, after enduring one of 2 hours for a few months, I'd never go back. I've set a strict upper limit of 20 minutes each way. If I can't get to work in 20 minutes, I move. It is that simple. I'm happier, though probably poorer for it. Move to your job, or move your job to nearer home. It's not a decision you'll ever regret.
There are a lot of issues here. These range from planning law: Zoning actually prevents people living and working in the same area; to Public transport, which is poor. These policy decisions have the effect of forcing people to the car, and so car-friendly policies which often preclude other forms of transport, become the norm. This has the effect, over a couple of generations of encouraging people to make a bad choice of a nice house far, far from work. People don't take into account the economic and emotional cost of their TIME when factoring the utility of house purchases, and having bought a house 30 miles or more from work, agitate for more road-building to mitigate the inevitable congestion of near-mandatory car use. This is an economic error made by people & governments which probably costs "the west" more in happiness than any other.
If you cut your commute to less than half an hour from 2 hours, it's like getting a 80% pay rise in terms of happiness. If you think your long commute makes sense, or you think it suits you, you're probably wrong. You also probably think you have no choice. You do.
2) I arrive all sweaty. Not necessarily. It is possible to cycle at a lower cadence using no more energy than walking. This is what most Dutch and Danish commuting cyclists do, and makes sense for short, urban commutes of less than a couple of miles. If you do want to thrash yourself on the way to work over a long journey, many offices have showers and lockers. Or it maybe possible to use a nearby Gym. Once you're used to rolling out of bed into cycling gear, and showering at the office, it's easy and makes a lot of sense. You get your exercise in before coffee & breakfast. Breakfast at the desk isn't all bad.
3) It's uncomfortable. No it isn't. Well, you just need to acclimatise your sit-bones, which takes a week. And the kit needs to fit you and the job you want it to do. You need the right saddle. That comfortable-looking wide, gel filled saddle which looked and felt so great in the shop actually prevents blood getting to key muscles causing cramp and soreness on any more than a trip to the shop. Mega-distance cyclists are almost unanimous on Brooks as the way to go as it moulds to your sit-bones after a couple of hundred miles. A thinner, stiffer saddle is actually more comfortable than the big soft one. Look at what people who spend all day in the saddle use. Saddles needs to fit. Spend a bit of money on it.
Make sure the saddle is the right height. That probably means putting it up a couple of inches. Most inexperienced cyclists have the saddle far too low. This causes back and knee pain. Ultimately the cycling position you choose is a compromise: the more efficient pedalling action is upright, like a dutch bike, but as you go faster, the more hunched over you need to be to combat wind resistance which increases with the square of speed. Utility bikes are more upright than tourers, which are more upright than audax bikes, road racer, Time-trial and triathlon bikes, which are uncomfortable and unsuitable for traffic, are the most 'bum-in-the-air' geometry widely available. There is a bike for every occasion: from Downhill mountain bikes to Track bikes. From touring bikes to fixies, don't go into a bike shop and let yourself be sold what's available to them. Research what it is you want to do, and talk to cyclists who are already doing it.
Above all, don't ever, ever, ever buy a cheap mountain bike. They are shit, when you can get a perfectly serviceable hybrid bike for £300. Halfords' £300 'full suspension' 'mountain' bikes are probably the cause of more people abandoning cycling as a means of transport than anything else. They're heavy, have knobbly tyres, which whirr along the road. That sound energy is being taken from the energy propelling you to the destination, yet the bikes are completely unsuitable for off-road work, where they are unsafe as the forks and frame just aren't strong enough. If you want to start commuting to work, get a bike designed for the job. Remember this: Light, strong, cheap: choose two. Knobbly tyres aren't safer, and fat tyres may be more comfortable, but at the cost of a lot of extra work.
If you start to enjoy cycling then you can decide whether you want to go knobbly & off road, or skinny, bendy-barred and on-road. Or both, but remember you're using an engine with about 1/3rd horsepower. Everything is a compromise. Before you start making decisions as to which expensive bike to get (and you will...) make sure you've thought of the compromises you are actually making. In general though, a touring bike or Audax bike will be suitable for most people who don't go off road/track in most circumstances. 4) Weather. There is no such thing as bad weather, just the wrong clothes. Spend money on the right kit, you'll be comfortable in all weather. There's a certain hero value in winter commuting on a bicycle. Whenever I saw footage of snow on the news in the UK, there's always a hardy cyclist getting through it.
5) You can't carry much stuff. How much stuff do you actually need? And you would be surprised how much you can get on some bikes. Golf-clubs for example have never been a problem for me. I can carry a week's shopping in a back-pack. If you add panniers and racks a family shop shouldn't be a problem. If you invest in a cargo-bike, you've got more capacity than a small car boot.
So after years of cycling what do I do? For the daily commute I use a Courier Bag which I had custom-made by Bagaboo. The Large workhorse messenger bag is quite beautifully designed and keeps kit dry and can easily carry enough kit for a weekend away. I have a handlebar bag and saddle-bag by Ortlieb. On the Brompton, I have the front luggage, and use the rack to carry a rucksack if necessary.
6) Cycling kit looks ridiculous. Yes, it does, if you think the clothes worn by the mobile advertising hoardings of the Giro D'Italia & Tour de France are all that's available. However there are plenty of people supplying clothes cut for cycling, which look normal off the bike. They are expensive, but so's any specialist kit. Outlier and Rapha are two which spring to mind.
It's perfectly possible to throw a pair of trousers over your bib-shorts at your destination. You can even get cycling shoes you'd be able to wear in the pub or a reasonably dress-down office. Dromarti & Quoc Pham's leather offerings look pretty good. And a Merino wool cycling shirt looks ok with jeans in the pub. It's not all Lycra and polyester. I've even eschewed the helmet for a stylish cap.
7) I like the freedom of the Car. So do I. No-one is saying you have to get rid of it, as I have mine. But consider this: Insurance: £600+ per year. Tax: £200+, MOT/Service: £600+. Depreciation: can be thousands a year. If you replace the car with the bike for a daily commute, how often do you actually need a car? Once a week? You can hire a car for £33 a day. You're still in pocket and you don't have to worry about it when you're not using it. When you need a small car, hire a cheap small car, when you need a van or estate, hire one of them. You're more flexible. And faster. Everyone knows hire cars are the fastest vehicles on the road.
8) It's dangerous. But not as dangerous as being fat. In any case, cycling is only dangerous to the inexperienced. Teenagers especially. Cyclists in general face lower mortality per journey than motorists, and lower mortality per KM than motorcyclists or pedestrians. When you consider how much of the "danger" of cycling is concentrated in a few demographics - teenagers especially, the statistics for adult cyclists who know what they're doing on properly maintained kit will look even better.
Give it some thought, ditch the car, and buy a bike.